citizen’s survey, traffic, and blanchards
May 3, 2008 at 7:58 am | In barnstable, barnstable town council, centerville, council president janet joakim, hyannis, janet joakim, janet swain joakim, municpal politics |Tags: barnstable, barnstable town council, blanchards, centerville, liquor store, rt. 28
The Town Manager gave a preliminary overview of this year’s town survey done annually by Bridgewater State College during a budget workshop on May 1.
The survey gives us further insight into what is on the minds of the majority of Barnstable residents.
We use our survey as we develop our strategic plan, and it is considered in issues like zoning and the town manager’s budget priorities.
Year after year the number one complaint from residents is traffic. In village meetings, citizen’s groups, and around town we hear about how bad traffic is, from Cotuit to Hyannis on Rt. 28 and from Barnstable to Hyannis on Rt 132, you have told us you want us to do something about traffic.
The citizen’s survey reflects this sentiment.
Further, our local comprehensive plan addresses traffic issues overall and each village plan does the same.
In the survey - with a choice of excellent, good, fair or poor - 71.5% of Barnstable residents surveyed responded that traffic conditions in town are fair or poor.
Additionally, a specific and important question asked last year and again in this year’s survey was:
Do you favor or oppose a plan which would limit retail growth as a means to improve traffic on areas such as Route 132, the Cape Cod Mall area, Rt. 28 or in your village? This year - 61% FAVORED, 31.4% OPPOSED with 7.7% not responding.
How do we reconcile all of this with Zoning Board of Appeals decisions like the recent Blanchards decision? This project dragged on for 2 years, but that long process was not the town’s fault. The town and ZBA were not responsible for those delays. Yet, a piece of each statement explaining a vote to grant the special permit was that the property owner has “waited for two years.”
The developer purchased the property with the assumption they would get this special permit.
Why?
We have serious problems on route 28 that need to be solved. People are suffering from life-altering traffic accidents. People are frustrated with sitting in traffic. Just getting a set of traffic lights installed in one of the most dangerous intersections is taking years and demonstrates that the state is not going to jump to the plate with initiatives to fix problems. I have learned that the state has lost and is losing more federal dollars used for our roads, essentially, to places beyond our own shores leaving our state roads budgets short.
It is up to us to control what goes on on the sides of these roads. We need to limit the traffic issues to what is there now.
Currently several of the more difficult areas of Rt. 28 are zoned for HB, which allows for office buildings and banks. Zoning doesn’t even allow for medical offices. This is all meant to curb development that would generate busy curbcuts! The only tool to get around those zoning ordinances is to apply for a special permit via the ZBA. The ZBA then uses the information given to them, their knowledge and understanding of the area’s needs, and input from citizens to determine if a project does not mean that: “Such uses do not substantially adversely affect the public health, safety, welfare, comfort or convenience of the community.” Barnstable Zoning Ordinance HB District § 240-25. sec C - 1- (c)
Blanchards 9800 sq foot liquor store is looking at adding 1600 trips a day, and will add to an already overburdened section of Rt. 28. The CVS that sits on the corner was was granted a special permit and it has added too much traffic. Did this set a precedent? Does this mean we should add more to that mess? In the hearings and discussions, there was little to no discussion about how a person would access this store from the west. In order to access the CVS from the west, a customer can use the left turn lane at the Strawberry Hill rt. 28 lights. How will anyone get into this store without a left turn from rt 28? The argument that people will simply not come from the west to this store doesn’t hold water, and I would bet doesn’t work into the overall business plan for this spot.
Left turns from the west have the potential to back traffic up to the intersection of Rt. 28 and Strawberry Hill Rd.
The ZBA’s approval of the special permit to allow the Blanchards, 9800 sq, open till 11pm, 7 nights a week, left turn “discouraged” curb-cuts project, is indicative of a larger problem.
We need to work more with our boards and committees about reconciling the Local Comprehensive Plan, the village plans, citizens surveys, and other tools with the zoning ordinances they use as guidelines. Our staff is developing a training manual and a program for our volunteers. Communication has to be better established among boards and commission and the council and staff.
The Town Council appoints the members of these committees, and you vote for us. As councilors we need to examine appointments and consider more outreach, because often particular appointments are made simply because there was only one person on applying for an open seat.
We need to reconsider that people who serve on boards must be people who are familiar with or who are in a business that interacts with these boards and committees, and thus have a better understanding related issues. There are a lot of intelligent people out there, who are capable of learning the in’s and outs of zoning or planning issues, of licensing or waste water or shellfish or moorings. We just need to find them and ask them to apply to serve.
Serving on these boards are are major commitments.
Just as it is hard to get a commitment, it is hard to give criticism to sitting members because the perception is that we don’t appreciate their work.
We do appreciate all of our volunteers. We just need to understand that ultimately we are responsible for the results of their work.
5 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
-
send me an email:
-
welcome to my blog
Seven Villages blog is a blog about the Town of Barnstable.
The views and opinions reflected in articles and posts on this site do not represent the entire town council, but simply personal perspectives.
Peace is always possible.
Janet Joakim
Town Council President
Town Council Precint 6 -
RULES:
The rules for leaving comments on this blog have changed. Anonymous comments will only be posted if I know who you are. Identities don't have to appear on the comments publicly, but I'll need to know who you are. This is an effort to change the nature of comments. -
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
Bob Lewsen on don’t forget - centervil… JSJ on political signs are personal… Christine on political signs are personal… Home-owners in Preci… on recall election JSJ on political signs are personal… Blogroll
- An Inspirational Video
- barnstable beat
- barnstable blog - inactive lately
- barnstable blog blaster
- CapeSite
- citizens for barnstable
- counterwind.blogspot.com/
- jim munafo - good news - inactive lately
- marissa’s blog
- rachael’s blog
- Send a thank you to our troops
- The COG Watcher
- THE TRUTH about PRECINCT 3
comedy relief
council president janet joakim
IMPORTANT discussions on other blogs
information related to posts
janet joakim
Worth a look
-
Pages
-
Meta
Archives
-
Spam Blocked
-
Blog Stats
- 78,341 hits
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Is there a screening mechanism for COGSTA gangstas? It would seem that a few have made it through.
Too bad they prefer to remain anonymous!
Don’t know how you are sticking with this Janet. We are behind you. There are so many others who have had enough of this below the belt crap.
We stopped reading the. Patriot as of last week. They have sunk lower and lower and are wallowing in the cog muck. A stench that only Swines can tolerate.
Comment by wiseguysruntheworld — May 3, 2008 #
I assume the next step to stop the Blanchard’s Booze Emporeum being located by the middle school is to speak with the Licensing Board. Any timeline when they will deal with the permitting on this issue?
Comment by Coddah — May 3, 2008 #
Actually - the next chapter is the cape cod commission. The town manager referred the project as a developement of regional impact, DRI, to the cape cod commission.
Comment by JSJ — May 3, 2008 #
thanks wise guy - I am going to leave a comment on the post about the open meeting.
the sunk really low today, with the help of a local business owner.
We need to start looking closer at the pots who are calling the kettle black.
Comment by JSJ — May 3, 2008 #
Got home from a long day out to find several messages on my blog, in my email, and on my phone.
Seems a local businessman had a check of mine that was returned years ago posted on a wall. For $45. I didn’t know about it, don’t have a record of it… $45, I would have paid him.
He gave the check to taryn thoman who then copied it and posted it all over lopez’s blogs and apparently several other blogs she has going about my family etc…
I had a disagreement with this business person about an order 10 years ago. I won’t share the details of that disagreement, as that was between he and I. He does a lot of business with schools and other local organizations. And, just like he did with this check, I didn’t even tell him the whole issue, just donated the stuff.
Despite the fact there is some attempt at telling the story on Lopez’s site, the story lopez tells is all wrong. (I never ordered a $300 uniform.)
I didn’t read it all but one of the messages said there is actually a comment about my mother somewhere in his story. My mother does’t live around here, and has nothing to do with any of this, beyond what she has stumbled on on the internet. She has more important things to worry about right now.
So we will go to his store and thank him for this new way of letting people know they had a check returned, and pay him. Perhaps we will get copies of the other checks he has posted from others who have cut it too close, and let those people know what they are in for. Seems like small claims or a collection agency would work. I had to use collection agencies in my own business, and they simply take a cut, it keeps the losses down and gives people a chance to make good in installments.
Further, a while back when she was running for charter commission, someone left a post about our check copying friend on my blog. I think if gave details of some unpaid bills, various leins etc that are attributed to her directly, all public record. I might have deleted it but one of the emails I received tonight gives details of all of this again.
Lopez hasn’t got leins because despite his “fight for the home-owners”, he isn’t one. He doesn’t own a home here in Barnstable. Several people have done that research.
There is more to that story, but I haven’t wanted to get any further into the gutter with these people.
It makes it safer to libel when you have no property at stake. As other have learned in past examinations of his blog, it seems that attorney’s won’t work on contigency if there is no property to collect from, thus making a civil suit costly for those who file.
But, after a quick look at that mess he has posted, and thoman’s part in it, it is time to examine each case again, in a future post that will be something about black pots and kettles.
Comment by JSJ — May 3, 2008 #